Time Deprived — What We Can Learn from the Gutai

2 Apr

I’m realizing it’s not that I don’t like working.  It’s not that I can’t stand corporate culture.  It’s not even the many long hours I’ve logged (fortunately not as long, recently, as the hours I put in as a litigation associate in some of the more notoriously hard-driving firms).  If there were nothing else to do, all of that would be fine.  The problem is that my life seems to somehow have gotten lost in the midst of the ladder climbing, off hours networking, and frequent spells of late nights into early morning hours and sometimes all nighters to crank out a brief or Wells submission.  All of that compounded so that something also was lost in the wind-down period after work, when I tried to clear my head of memos that needed editing and witnesses to be prepped.  I was fortunate enough to leave Big Law before demanding partners and nervous clients had 24 hour access to young associates via e-mail and iPhones.  I did have a Blackberry, and a Blueberry (remember those, anyone?), but the technology was still new, and we were all wet behind the ears with it.  Back then, it wasn’t yet a given that checking your email would be the first thing you did when you woke up in the morning and the last thing you did at night (and countless times in between).  The practice of unfettered access to me and my mind had not yet become normalized, and as taken for granted as brushing your teeth.  It was more like flossing — only practiced religiously by some (roughly 50% of all people).

Today is Day Two of being unemployed.  Yesterday, a Monday, my mother was still here from her regular Easter visit.  So we took the day and went to the Guggenheim on a whim (or instinct – the Gutai: Splendid Playground exhibit dovetailed perfectly with a book I just finished, The Hare with Amber Eyes by Edmund de Waal, which I allowed myself time to read only because it was part of a book club I’ve been involved with for years, which is comprised of the mothers of my older daughter’s classmates, and is my sole source of regular socializing).

I knew we would be doing something but I didn’t know what.  Mom has come from Wisconsin to visit several times a year since I moved out here 14 years ago.  We’ve never had a day when I wasn’t working.  I’ve meant to take time off for her visits, but it just never really worked out.  We had weekends together, usually with me slipping in some work when she would go to take one of her long walks around my Brooklyn neighborhood, coming back with all the news of my nabe, and telling me about the people she had met — folks I have lived near for more than a dozen years but rarely had time to get to know.  So yesterday, I was looking forward to merely doing anything that wasn’t working.  We woke up and she suggested the Guggenheim.  I was embarrassed that I had never been — you know, typical New Yorker, surrounded by the coolest stuff in the world and unable to take advantage because of putting in the long hours needed to live here.  The eternal New Yorker’s dilemma.  As I took care of a bit of paperwork before we left the house, she said that we didn’t have to go if it would be difficult to find the Guggenheim, and that she didn’t want us to spend all day looking for it.  While my mother is fairly “hip,” occasionally she says something that reminds me she was indeed born 25 years before me.  I reassured her all we had to do was look online and get directions.  ”Oh, okay, well only if it’s not a problem.”  ”No, Mom,” I said clearly confused by her skepticism — “That’s not a problem at all.”

She’d been to the Guggenheim one time before, an aborted trip 44 years ago.  I’d heard this in passing before, but yesterday as we took the F to the 6 then walked up Lexington from 86th to 88th, turned left and continued to 5th Avenue (also known as Museum Mile, I pointed out to her), I collected previously undisclosed details.  I guided her confidently on our trip, and she gave color to the trip she and Dad took so many years ago.  It turns out they had spent the better part of a day looking for the museum.  They got lost in Harlem, somehow ended up in Chinatown and got lost there too, went over the George Washington bridge several times and back (my father added this detail when I talked to him last night, and, typical Dad, pointed out that the toll back then was only $.50, and that now it would have been a very expensive detour).  So Mom explained that by the time they got to the Guggenheim, she was suffering from a bad migraine and that by the time she circled around the third level of the museum’s iconic twisting interior, she was throwing up.  When my mom throws up, she really throws up.  She’s suffered migraines since I was little, so I have been unwilling witness to this more times than I can count.  Having now walked the incline of the museum’s levels, I can imagine this particular museum is probably one of the worst places in the world to suffer a vomiting fit.  My father is a buttoned-up kind of guy, in his own way.  Not one for mess or plans derailed or being lost or inconvenience of any kind, I was thus surprised when Mom told me he offered to carry her in his arms back down the winding walkway.  I appreciated hearing this snippet of tenderness between my parents, who have been separated since I was five.  She said it with an appreciative kind of tenderness in her voice too.  Last night when Dad saw my pictures from the Guggenheim posted online, he called and shared a couple other details of their trip.  I told him I was surprised when Mom said they did not necessarily intend to come to New York, that they just decided to “head east,” with no particular destination in mind (again, very atypical of my father).  He confirmed this; they left Beloit in their little black 1965 Mustang in September 1968 and ended up in New York.  The hotel recommended by Dad’s Air Force buddy, Skipper Smith, who he had been stationed with in Grand Forks (where he met Mom) and later Panama, turned out to be so seedy that my parents slept with their clothes on and over (not under) the blankets.  Not surprisingly, their NYC trip spanned no more than a couple days.  They left the gritty city and headed for the more hospitable Niagara Falls.  Despite their roller coaster trip in a city fully contrary to my Dad’s core conservatism and my mother’s Catholic traditionalism, old video footage of their visit and the stories I’ve heard throughout the years, tells me it was a time they both still cherish.  They were free, young, and in love.  And I like to think that in some grand scheme of things way, my choosing to make this place home had something to do with their visit.  Maybe it was the unlikely sight of my mom and dad, surrounded by Hari Krishnas in Battery Park.  If nothing else, I knew the place was interesting.

Yesterday, Mom and I circled all the way to the top of the Guggenheim, and all the way back down.  I took a picture of her near the very top of the circle.  I don’t think I’ve ever seen such lightness in her eyes before.  For her, this was a circle completed.  For me, it was one just opening up.  Viewing the art was like a salve to my computer weary eyes.  I thought of my youngest daughter, Z, who has not yet been to a museum.  I thought of my older daughter, A, and wished we had been to more.  But, most importantly, I was thinking about the moment.  It’s hard not to be in the moment when you’re looking at Franz Marc’s “Yellow Cow,” or Kandinsky’s “Small Pleasures,” or reading the Gutai manifesto, where everything is about being concrete and letting matter and material speak for itself, or standing inside a giant cube made of red vinyl (a refabrication of a work originally by Tsuruko Yamazaki) or looking for a marker (they all had disappeared) to draw on the communal stand-alone surface called Please Draw Freely, originally conceived by Jiro Yoshihara for the outdoor Gutai Art Exhibition in 1956, from which many of the pieces currently on exhibit were drawn.  I think my favorite piece of the Gutai exhibit was Yoshihara Jiro’s Circle, made, I noticed, in 1971, the year I was born.  It is just a white circle on a black square.  But to me, it says everything.  Everything that cannot be put into words.  And thus we have art.

And, yesterday, for the first time in a very long time, I had time to look at art.  My mind was not weighed down with to do’s still undone.  I was free, young (it’s all relative), and in love with the moment.  The toll that over-working takes on individuals (and, by extension, families) is extensive and expensive.  We pay other people to teach our kids art, culture, and music because we don’t have the time (or by the time we do have the time, we don’t have the energy) to do it ourselves.  The Gutai movement, which was started in Japan by Jiro Yoshihara in 1954 and was active until his death in 1972, was a collective of artists who believed art was key to breaking the chains of totalitarianism.  Its audience was often children, since it was (wisely) believed they held the key to building a future of free thinkers.  Play was therefore key in their process and approach, and many of the exhibits and installations encourage play.  In the few hours a day most families have together anymore,  there’s barely time to take care of the essentials like getting mouths fed, dishes washed, clothes cleaned, bodies bathed, homework done, floors vacuumed (and rarely can we tick all those off the list in a given day or week), let alone add time for play.  This loss of play is hard on us, our kids, our relationships, our health.

What may be most damaging to the fabric of us, as a people, is that by the time we get to taking care of the essentials, our bodies and minds are drained, with no built-in charger.  Like the Gutai manifesto says, “Art is the home of the creative spirit … .”  There’s not time for the things that heal us, like writing, drawing, meditation, music, prayer, gathering for the sake of gathering, long dinners, story telling, breaking bread and sharing wine.  Other cultures have maintained some of this social nourishment.  Why can’t we?  There seems to be a recognition that something has broken and needs healing.  There are groups like ArtJamz, a public space that encourages creation of art for art’s sake.  And organizations like see.me, which is in the vanguard of democratizing art (and once that happens, hopefully more people will be creating art), and there are still the vestiges of a freer time, like the Lower East Side’s A Gathering of the Tribes, a writers’ and artists’ community started by Steve Cannon, now 78 and still running it from his couch, where everyone, even if you’ve never been there before, is a writer or artist and, if being introduced by Steve, is “the best damn [poet/artist/fill in the blank] around.”  Although these places exist, it’s still going to take something more to fix the bigger problem.  It will take employers to see the whole person and not just a worker.  It will take a movement, the kind that unfortunately doesn’t usually ignite until we’ve hit rock bottom (keep in mind the Gutai movement was born in post-war Japan, and first received widespread recognition when it invited Time magazine to cover an exhibit it put on in a bombed out building), and I don’t know that we’re there yet, even for as exhausted as we are now.

If one thing is clear, it’s that it hasn’t always been like this.  My mom and dad’s tale of setting out with “no particular place to go” decades ago is all the evidence I need to know that it’s not my imagination that time is not what it used to be.  My dad traveled a lot for his job as I was growing up.  He was in the first wave of frequent fliers, who collected their miles and had few restrictions on how to use them.  By the time I was 15, he had built up so many miles that we were able to take a trip (back when frequent flyer miles were still transferable to other people) to Japan.  I was surprised he chose Japan.  He’s a meat and potatoes, ultra patriotic (“U-S-A, U-S-A”) American.  I still need to go back to try some sushi.  We ate at all the McDonald’s and Red Lobsters we could find.  I also need to go back — even if it’s in philosophy and not geography — to see if I can’t find the source of play, and some way to create time for it.  This may just be one of the hardest jobs I’ve had.   I always have been a firm believer that time is an invention.  But life isn’t.  And even if we can’t re-create time, maybe we can recreate our lives in it.

Another Name for a Three Way

26 Mar

And what exactly is meant by a “MULTI-WAY”? Aerie, you ought to be ashamed of yourself. But I guess you can’t know shame if you don’t know modesty.

Aerie is the underwear company started by American Eagle Outfitter (AEO) in 2006, which targets the “teen lingerie market” according to businessinsider.com, and which recently hired Jenn Rogien, the costume designer from the HBO series “Girls,” and also promotes the “concert bra,” a push-up bra promoted at the music festival Coachella, which can be worn on its own or with outer garments and which comes with matching panties. Aerie runs an ad with a close up to illustrate their push-up bra that adds two cup sizes. The image is followed by another showing animated words “DOUBLE WHOA” appearing on top of the feigning surprised young model’s body. Although the company purports to target the 18 to 21 age group, Bloomberg reports that Aerie’s VP of Global Merchandising, Jennifer Foyle, admitted recently that the younger focus is “timely because you do see this as a growing category in the industry for sure.”  PrimalGrowth business strategy consultants state the obvious: “Stores are all going to say they’re targeting the 18- to 22- year olds, but the reality is you’re going to get the younger customer.”  Of course the companies say they’re not targeting tweens, but parents, rightfully, aren’t buying it.  Another parent of a three-year old (my own daughters are 23 and almost 3), wrote a letter to Victoria’s Secret expressing his concern about the sexualization of young girls, and it must be striking a chord because it’s gone viral, and VS is denying his claims (my lady doth protest too much?).

On Valentine’s Day this year, Bloomberg.com ran a story about the burgeoning tween lingerie industry. According to the article, female intimate apparel (I don’t think we can call it “women’s” anymore) is an $11.1 billion industry, with Victoria’s Secret youth line “Pink” estimated to take $3 billion of the market in just a few years. American Eagle was among top-performing retail stocks last year, at a time when it is cutting back on other apparel in favor of expanding its lines of bra, underwear and loungewear (Aerie F.I.T. line – not sure I want to know what that is said to stand for behind closed AEO doors – but I invite any AEO’rs to spill the beans — I promise anonymity).

One thing AEO needs to keep in mind is that parents, moms of girls in particular (and I rarely distinguish between moms and dads but here is a rare occasion it’s appropriate), hate being the object of deception. While Aerie is claiming to target 18 to 21 year olds, it runs ads where a young looking and acting model skips topless, wearing thongs, making faces, holding her hair up in pigtails, playing peekaboo, undressing, swaying her hips while standing pigeon-toed and pouty-mouthed, floating toy sailboats in a pond wearing nothing but bra and panties, while a young Mick Jagger like voice sings “I just wanna run away with you.” Multiple times, the word “PRETTY” is seen in white lettering on a boathouse behind the almost naked model.

Aerie’s Foyle told Bloomberg, “[w]e really use the word ‘pretty’ more than ‘sexy’ — that’s really not the Aerie girl.” From a quick search, it appears Aerie primarily uses Sports Illustrated swimsuit models for their ads (Nina Agdal and Cintia Dicker). Pretty not sexy, huh?

I found the Aerie ads on several sites that clearly view the ads as more sex than aesthetics.  One, guyspeed.com, describes Aerie as a “mall lingerie store for college-aged girls and those who skew a wee but younger,” and calls a holiday commercial featuring Agdal’s “rock hard body,” “certainly more, uh, mature…”  It continues, stating, “We really like it when she models undies for Aerie. We get to see lots of her body.”  Another, whoisthathotadgirl.tumbler.com features several Aerie ads, introducing “another American Eagle commercial featuring Cintia (with a little topless action…).”  On spike.com, the “PRETTY” ad is described: “Brazilian model Cintia Dicker’s breasts go “Whoa” and increase in this sexy” — note, not pretty — “new spot for Aerie’s push-up bras.”

So what does Rogien think of girl’s underwear, if it’s not sex?  Before being hired by Aerie, the former Girl’s show costume designer told Women’s Wear Daily that lingerie factored into each character.  According to Rogien, “There’s a lot of sex in the show, but its not sexy sex. It’s awkward, funny and sometimes silly sex, and underwear is a big part of it. There’s a lot of underwear as we head into these sex scenes,” she said.  This distinction between “funny” and “silly” sex (as opposed to, what, grumpy and grave sex) sounds more like justification.  It’s an awful lot like her distinction between sexy and pretty — useless.

Even the leering boy bloggers know what’s up.  Spike.com comments on Aerie’s ad campaign titled “Love is Funny.”  (Sounding familiar?)  They note: “Why [is it called "Love is Funny]? I have no idea. The video doesn’t seem to have anything to do with love, and is not funny. At all. You may fall in love with Cintia and her model friends that traipse around in their underwear giggling and loving life. But that’s more lust than love, right?  And there is nothing wrong with lust.”  Well, it depends — on a lot, age probably being first and foremost.

Aerie, you remind me of a 13 year old who tells me the peppermint schnapps smell is from the candy canes at her school’s Christmas party and that the smoke is second hand. Moms can smell BS a mile away, and you are putting it right under our noses. Your crossing the line may raise your stock in the short term and endear you to skeezy and horny adolescent males, but at least in the tween category, we still hold the purse strings.

Aerie, of course, isn’t the only offender.  Victoria’s Secret is the center of a firestorm over its plans (now shelved) to launch a line aimed at a younger audience (like, Aerie, VS denies that its targeting very young girls, but the ads speak for themselves).  Its “Bright Young Things” campaign has gotten whiplash over the backlash, with countless people vowing to ban not just the line but the VS brand if it goes forward with the full launch, and an online petition at www.forcechange.org asking the CEO to stop the objectification of young girls and women.  It reads, in part:  ”[you] feature younger looking teen models who are scantily clad and provocatively posed and the slogan, ‘Bright Young Things.’  By choosing to target teenagers with your new line, you are condoning teen sexuality and portraying teens as sexual objects.  Your slogan refers to young women as ‘things,’ rather than many more appropriate alternatives.”  I wonder at what point the negative press stops being free advertising for these companies and becomes the wake up call it should be.

The issue has become more serious than whether parents will buy the bra (or whatever else they’re selling) or young girls will find a way to buy it themselves, or if boys will buy it for them.

In February, New Jersey busted a child pornography ring, arresting 25 individuals, including two who were regular baby sitters and one who was a registered sex offender.  The porn obtained in the bust included footage of children ranging from toddlers to ten-year olds who were the victims of rape, sodomy, necrophilia, bestiality and other incomprehensible crimes against humanity.  The ring spanned eleven counties across the state.  According to reports, the files also showed prepubescent boys and girls being sexually molested or being forced into performing sex acts on themselves or others.

Aerie, I’m not saying you are responsible for sexual crimes against children, but targeting a very young market with ads like the one that arrived at my door this morning that sound like the name of a porn flick (“MADDIE MULTI-WAY”), you are walking a line too thin to ignore.  You hire the savviest, most experienced advertisers, marketers, and decision makers for your company.  Don’t tell me you didn’t intend the double entendres.  It is a slippery slope from accepting this kind of sexual imagery to child porn just being taken as a fact of life.

It is unacceptable.

20130326-134831.jpg

20130326-134921.jpg

Valentine’s Day Makes You Fat

14 Feb

I don’t mean to be unromantic.  But there’s few ways to slice it.  Either you’re swilling your way through champagne and chewing on chocolates till the night swells to its intended progression, or your spoon is hitting the bottom of an ice cream pint you’re emptying over Law and Order reruns.  Little else in between is devoid of naughty nibbles and waist-line widening wares.  I mean, it is Valentine’s Day after all, so even those of us snug in a marriage with regular old family dinner planned would be feeling just a little cheated if we didn’t indulge in the office treats the stick-thin temptress admin brings  in or a chocolate-laced dessert picked up at the corner store after the baby’s in bed.  On either end of the spectrum and at all points between, Valentine’s day is as lethal to a diet as Ramadan is helpful.  Maybe Lent should be revised so that it requires a person to do something, as opposed to restraining them.  Then, instead of giving up Facebook, like some of my friends are doing, we would be waking up at 5 a.m. to go jogging.  Oh, wait, we can do that with or without Lent.  Fear of God helps, though – stronger than cupid’s arrow.  Whatever your poison or passion this Valentine’s day, here’s hoping you indulge in the best of it.  For tomorrow we … jog?

Control And Entropy

13 Feb

I wonder if ancestral mamas, when their kiddies left the cave at the ripe old age of maybe 10 or so, swept the ground, lit the torch, poured themselves a hefty glass of creek wine, and looking around, thought of how they might redecorate.

I left the nest at the ripe old age of 16, after several years of being enough of a pain in the butt I thought for sure my mother would only deem my absence a relief.  While that may have been true, she was nonetheless a tough mama and fought for the daughter she should have, at that point, cared little about.  Citing irreconcilable differences with her, I ran into the arms (more precisely, apartment) of a boyfriend, who, if not abusive, was only one argument away.  He, like I, had been raised without many accoutrements of the otherwise middle-class neighborhoods we lived in.  He, unlike I, had a mother who, at least for a time, preferred the bars to her children.  I made several scouting expeditions with him on weeknights, looking for the next dark bar she might be in, and waited in the car while he found some way to finagle her out of those uninhabitable places to take her home to tuck in his baby brother and sister, while his sister four years his junior sucked down her cigarettes, kept the phone in her hand, and swore endlessly under her breath, sparing the littler ones curses to which she was wholly entitled.

My own parents, not knowing the details of my late night whereabouts but understandably uncomfortable with my current living situation, tried to wrest me from that upstairs apartment on Parker Drive and back into the long and lonely ranch house that now only my mother occupied. I explained to them calmly, and I’m sure with face-smackingly-worthy smugness, that I was not moving back home and if they wanted me out of Parker Drive, they would have to provide another place for me to stay.  That place, I had already calculated, was my father’s now-empty bachelor pad (by this time, he was spending his days at a job in Chicago and his nights with his then girlfriend, now wife, which we all knew this but he was face-smackingly-worthy cagey about it anyway).  I knew the place on East Holmes was empty, save for a living room that contained a mint mid-century sofa, a handful of books (a dusty Bible and Jonathan Livingston Seagull among them), and a small cache of LPs, standing (laying them flat would bend them, I’m sure he had determined), with one that inexplicably memorably had a man with an afro, surrounded by women of varying skin tones, and the words “Variety Is the Spice of Life” on the back cover.  In the remaining rooms (a kitchenette, which was clean but unremarkable), there was not much more than a meticulously made bed (single), and a one-person shower with tiny shampoo bottles on the tile floor in the corner.  It was perfect.

To my parent’s credit, they saw past my connivances, and let me stay at East Holmes anyway.  Maybe now I romanticize the reason — they must have known that I was mature enough and simply needed some freedom, and of course would be responsible with it — the truth is it was probably just one of the countless disputes they couldn’t resolve because their conclusions (and all that led up to them) were anchored in opposite ends of existence.  Most likely, entropy claimed its prize (and so did I).

In all my 41 years (nearing 42), it’s true that East Holmes probably is as free as I’ll ever be.  So I thank my parents for that (in)decision.

When I returned home for a brief period, a year (and five months pregnant) later, I was stunned to see gorgeous cream, plush carpeting blanketing the expanse of the living room in the house where I grew up.  All the years I had been there (the house was purchased when I was four in 1975 – when we moved in I was 5), that room had long suffered the indignity of threadbare carpet of a dull green (puke-colored on bad days, olive when the sun encouraged it, hopelessly).  My two sisters and I spent our youths pounding the life out of that thin thing, from summers where our bodies nearly bore holes in front of the tv or in late night fights with five or more girls circling the expanse of the house, chasing each other, laughing and fighting, grabbing hair and telephones, fists and ponytails flying).  And now, here was this new living room — shockingly bright, and probably beautiful, but barely recognizable.

I realized.  Mom had moved on.  She was redecorating.  The last of her baby birds had flown the nest and in place of the swoony weepy sadness I had expected to see, was this brand spanking new carpet with the look of wedding cake frosting.  She had a brand new white rug.  And, soon, I was gonna have a baby.  I started looking for an apartment that week.

My Hometown

6 Feb

1.

My hometown.  The train.

The horn. Cigarettes.

Dusty old tracks.

Dew in the morning

on my feet

in my face

The air, crisp.

Crunch of leaves

under my cold feet.

 

In my hometown

it is always fall

It is always morning

It is always wet

I am always home.

 

2.

full rumbling belly

longing to be gone

Leaping toward the world

From birth, ready

to leave these tracks

Empty aching belly.

 

3.

When I go back,

Raiders, crusaders, towers 

consume all that was,

take my place.

 

I do not hear the train.

I do not long to be gone.

Keys in my pocket, and

a baggage stub.

I am not home.

This is not my hometown.

 

Image

In Case You Weren’t Sure the Species

4 Feb

20130204-114540.jpg

Momopting

24 Dec

I suppose this it was family unfriendly five generations ago? Does this also mean it’s been mom-owned for any of those four generations?

20121224-113020.jpg

Image

Blame It On The Mom

24 Dec

20121224-112639.jpg

Oh My Godiva

20 Dec

I love the holidays!

20121220-125136.jpg

Growing Up

9 Dec

Disappointment is your favorite drink 22 years later.  #fuckfrangelico

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 613 other followers

%d bloggers like this: